Skip to content

Mapping Flickr photos and Twitter tweets

Eric Fischer- Twitter and Flickr World Map - CC Cultural Product Copyright 2011

Eric Fischer- Twitter and Flickr World Map - CC Cultural Product Copyright 2011

Eric Fischer of Oakland California has produced a stunning set of maps of flickr photos and Twitter tweets from geolocation tags in the posts.  These respatialize the world as lit up by these particular forms of new media/Web 2.0 use.  A higher resolution image of the world map is also online.   I especially like the North American map with its annotated areas and zoomable detail.  A Toronto Star article gives more detail, but browse the photostream of cities.  What is interesting is to see the lack of popularity of flickr in a city such as Jakarta or Singapore, and the obvious importance of blue twitter in suburbs (see Toronto).  Twitter follows main roads, suggesting the importance of tweeting from automobiles and public transport.  Mobility:  Twitter as commuting, flickr as tourist travel?   Spectacular tourism sites such as Banff and Jasper in the Rocky Mountains appear as red-orange flickr concentrations without tweets. These media settle like mists, differentially on the topography and the activity-scapes of everyday life.

-Rob

McLuhan 100 Anniversary

Sergio Benicio, UFPernambuco, Recife and Rob Shields, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton presenting on McLuhan and Virilio at the Media Ecology Association 2011 conference 'Space Place and the McLuhan Legacy'

Sergio Benicio, UFPernambuco, Recife and Rob Shields, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton presenting on McLuhan and Virilio at the Media Ecology Association 2011 conference 'Space Place and the McLuhan Legacy'

Happy Birthday Marshall!

Marshall McLuhan was born and spent his childhood in Edmonton in 1911, so we’re celebrating at the University over the next few months with the Media Ecology Association and a few projects such as Wave.

-Rob

CFP: Gender Cultures and Reality Television

Research Symposium: Gender Cultures and Reality TV
University of Auckland
Auckland, New Zealand
December 2-3, 2011

CALL FOR PAPERS

The aim of this symposium is to take advantage of our Asia-Pacific location by raising questions about gender and reality TV from a comparative, cross-cultural perspective. We are particularly interested in critical investigations of the intersections between gender, culture and place as engineered by reality television. While papers addressing reality television and gender from an international perspective are most welcome, we hope to maintain a critical focus on cultural specificity and the social geographies of gender, including the expressions and negotiations of indigenous, minoritarian, national and transnational cultures.

We invite papers on any aspect of gender, culture and reality TV, including the following topics:

• Culturally and/or nationally specific articulations of masculine or feminine identity in Reality TV
• The reconfiguration of gender-focused international formats within non-Western cultural contexts
• Gender, Reality TV and transnational flows of capital, culture and consumption
• Gendered identities within colonial/post-colonial/settlement narratives or histories
• The place of gender within a multiple modernities approach to Reality TV
• Gender, Reality TV and multiculturalism/biculturalism/mixed cultures
• Intersections of gender, race and/or ethnicity in Reality TV
• The relations between gender and individualised selfhood on Reality TV
• Reality TV as a site of gender performance and/or transformation
• Family and gender politics within Reality TV
• Sexual cultures and gender on Reality TV
• Gender, Reality TV and cultures of fandom and celebrity
• (Anti) heteronormative practices in reality programming
• Reality TV, gender and hierarchies of cultural value

Please submit a 300-word abstract & short biographical note to:

a.west@auckland.ac.nz
&
m.kavka@auckland.ac.nz

by 29 July, 2011.

Successful applicants will be notified by 19 August, 2011.

Book Review: Milieu and human identity: Notes towards a surpassing of modernity

Augustin Berque. Milieu et identité humaine. Notes pour un dépassement de la modernité (Milieu and human identity: Notes towards a surpassing of modernity). 2010. Paris: Editions Donner Lieu. 148 pp. ISBN 978-2-9532093-3-4.

Reviewed by Andrea Mubi Brighenti, Department of Sociology, University of Trento (IT)

After the catastrophic events that hit Japan, and particularly in the aftermath of the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster, a large scale debate about the sustainability of our energetic, economic and even civilizational model is badly needed. Such a huge task which is before us, and which calls for a general rethinking of our ecological approaches and aspirations, could perhaps start from some spatial and environmental insights that Japanese thought itself has transmitted to us.

The collection of short essays reviewed here provides an excellent introduction to the work of the French geographer and orientalist Augustin Berque (born in 1942), who has devoted most of his life to an exploration of Japanese thought and culture, with particular reference to its peculiar spatial and environmental attitudes. Not much of Berque’s oeuvre is available to English readers, yet his major theoretical works (Berque 2000a, 2000b) can be said to engage a dialogue with Japanese philosophical tradition in order to develop reflections that are more widely applicable to the contemporary world, rather than a merely philological reconstruction of certain sources – an intellectual project that somehow recalls what François Jullien has done with Chinese thought.

Traditional houses in Ogimachi by Guillaume Brialon

[CC image credit: Traditional houses in Ogimachi by Guillaume Brialon]

In a larger work that appeared nearly at the same time as the collection on milieu and human identity, Berque (2010) has explored the notion of the ‘ideal habitat’ and has questioned the contemporary transformation and sustainability of that ideal. In these shorter essays, written during the last ten years, the focus is rather on the notions of landscape, milieu, common heritage and identity. Starting from the acknowledgement that western modernity has produced a grave disequilibrium in the relation between the human species and the world – as landscape devastation, waste of natural resources and the many aberrations in the design of the urban built environment testify – the author advances a distinction between a western conception of landscape, pivoted around the subject, and an eastern conception, which instead focuses on the predicate–the latter logic being best represented by Nishida Kitarô’s basho no ronri, or logic of place, a text from 1966.

On the one hand, the author observes, an analysis of the Chinese Zong Bing’s (375-443) classic treaty on landscape painting (Shan Shui) shows a rising awareness of the spiritual dimensions of landscape many centuries before the western notion we employ was conceived during the Italian Renaissance period; on the other hand, in Japanese haiku poetry not only is the subject implicit, but there are verbal forms without a veritable subject. This latter fact should not be taken as a sign of abstraction of space from place; quite the contrary, Japanese sensibility remains extremely grounded in the ‘emplaced’ presences that ‘people a place’. For one of the most important Japanese philosophers of the twentieth century, Watsuji Tetsurô (who was born in 1889, the same year as Heidegger and Wittgenstein), the crucial notion of fûdo, or human milieu, can be found. To stress the fact that, contrary to a superficial impression, Watsuji’s notion does not entail a deterministic approach (i.e., the idea that the climate determines the mores and ethos of a people), Berque proposes to translate fûdo as médiance, meaning something that simultaneously mediates and is in the middle of the relation between a society and its environment. To be true, Berque also rejects the notion of environment as too objectivist, and prefers to speak of milieu, a concept which inherently entails a point of view from within on such a relationship.

The major argument running through the various essays of the book is that it is all the more urgent today to retrieve our perception of the horizon that surrounds us in order to give meaning to the scale of our actions. From this perspective, Berque speaks of ecoumène to address the phenomenon of the birth of a plurality of life-worlds through progressive unfolding and development of milieus. Hence, if the médiance is an always local and ‘emplaced’ relation between humans and their milieu, a reciprocal ‘absorption’ between a place and its inhabitants, the ecoumène is the human relation to the geographic extension of the planet at large. The ecoumène can be contrasted to the ‘cyborg landscape’, which the author criticises as landscape based on a mechanistic view which determines a detachment (débrayage) of people from their household (foyer), their horizon, and ultimately from the earth. Some further important insights ‘for a surpassing of modernity’ might also come from a comparative examination of the notion of heritage (patrimoine) in the East and in the West: in this respect, the author reflects, the traditional Japanese approach might help us to escape from the false alternative between mummification versus demolition of landscape which has characterised the Western approach to common heritage.

Perhaps Berque’s approach remains in many senses stuck to certain overall dichotomies, which might ultimately undermine his arguments. However, as suggested at the outset, a serious discussion on the human ecological relationship to the environment is so necessary today that all contributions attempting to open new perspectives – for instance, as in this case, through cross-cultural analysis of spatial concepts – should be greeted as most welcome.

References
Berque, Augustin (2000a) Écoumène. Introduction à l’étude des milieux humains. Paris: Belin.
Berque, Augustin (2000b) Médiance. De milieux en paysages. Paris: Belin.
Berque, Augustin (2010) Histoire de l’habitat idéal. De l’Orient vers l’Occident. Paris: Félin.

More information about Augustin Berque
Augustin Berque, Directeur d’études, EHESS
Augustin Berque – Wikipédia
Ecoumene

Book Review: Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism

Cooren, François. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. 2010. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 206 pp. ISBN 978-90-272-1023-4.

Reviewed by Patrick McLane, Department of Sociology, University of Alberta (CA)

François Cooren’s masterfully synthetic Action and Agency in Dialogue brings Bruno Latour’s actor-network-theory together with Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction to generate a unique perspective on discourse analysis. From Derrida (1988) Cooren takes the ideas that figures of speech cannot be isolated from their literal meanings and that action cannot be reduced to actors’ intentions. From Latour (2005) he gets the notion that humans are not the only actors.

Coffee

[Image credit: Patrick McLane]

This combination leads Cooren to focus on how nonhumans (institutions, texts, principles, objects, etc.) are active in dialogue. He argues that when people say ‘the memo dictates’ or ‘the lights alerted the burglar’ researchers should not supplant the memo with its author or disregard the lights in looking for the person who turned them on. The way action is attributed makes a difference with regards to findings of responsibility and opportunities for intervention. For example, to say ‘the hot coffee burned Denis’ invites inquiry into the temperature of the beverage and the way it was served (as in the notorious case of Liebeck v. McDonald’s). To say ‘Denis burned himself with his coffee’ still reports that Denis was burned and that a cup of coffee was involved but invites evaluations of Denis’ wakefulness and competence (162-163).

Likewise, saying ‘the jealous wife killed him’ is not the same as saying ‘jealousy struck again.’ As such Cooren writes that we should attend to how things like jealousy, scalding coffee and other people become present and active in our conversations (61, 76). How does jealousy take credit for something like a murder, lifting the burden off psychosis, culture and perhaps even the murderous lover? How is poor Denis made a klutz who needs his coffee served cold?

Action and Agency in Dialogue speaks to the importance of space and culture in understanding attributions of responsibility by prompting us to consider how material objects, virtual actors and human agents support, excuse and implicate one another. The book would be an excellent text for an advanced qualitative methods course. Students will be encouraged to think critically about what it means to act and how agency is distributed while being introduced to major thinkers ranging from John L. Austin through Harold Garfinkel and Michel Foucault. It is also a must read for those of us who think Latour and Derrida should be put to work together.

The book’s only fault is in its choice of examples. Cooren relies on fragments of talk recorded during ethnographic research with Medecins sans Frontiers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These call for more comprehensive analysis than is accorded to them as illustrations of the book’s theoretical points. For instance, commentary on the role of racial or colonialist prejudice in conversations between MSF administrators and African hospital staff is absent. Cooren explains that his three days in the field did not allow him to grasp subtle forms of discrimination (120) and he compensates for this with a useful discussion of the ways other authors have studied ethnocentrism through conversation analysis (113-121). However, it seems to me that by applying his novel ideas on action and agency to issues like prejudice Cooren would better show their applicability to everyday talk and utility for sociological research.

References

Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. and McDonald’s International, Inc. 1995 WL 360309 (D.N.M. 1994).