Comments from Salman Rushdie on freedom, religion, growing up in Bombay and England, and the theme of fear and happiness in the modern world and how it is anticipated in earlier imperial moments, such as the mid 1400s which saw the discovery of America, the flowering of Venice and Florence and, far to the east, the Mughal court in what is now northern India and Pakistan. This is the topic of his most recent book, The Enchantress of Florence.
In person, Rushdie is relaxed, wittier and far better read than one would expect. He is funny, almost like a comic who can’t help himself but make jokes that push the limits just past the conventional mores of his audience by saying publicly what might be thought privately. His ability to sustain conversations on history and ethics is also a surprise. I have just time to put up some of his comments on mobilities, frontiers, movement, cities, space and culture, based on my brief notes.
Home:
‘Many of us now come from many places… Its ok to feel at home in different places.’
‘Once you’ve packed and unpacked as many books [as I have in my move to New York in 1999], then that’s where you live!’
[Home is where there are] ‘Echos of home which you never have anywhere elses…’
Travel
To the question about what are the most difficult frontiers in a person’s life, regarding a quote from one of his books that humans are ‘frontier crossing’ people:
‘The most difficult…most important frontier…my father asked if I wanted to go to boarding school in England. My decision when I was 12…’
And later: ‘In ‘Ground Beneath our Feet’ [the argument is made that]…There are two great dreams: the dream of home and of leaving…the direction of away, our imaginings, what excites us is that, …the outcast. … What if Odysseus had stayed home… the journey of the person who departs is absolutely at the heart of our dreams…’
Religion
‘Despite the storehouse of powerful narratives which religions are …[there is, we live in a] Twilight of the gods. A time comes when we have to take on for ourselves our responsibility for our fate…this is a kind of growing up… found in both Nordid and Greek mythologies.’
The last time the Gods appear… intervene in the affairs of man… is the wedding of Cadmus the inventor of the alphabet and the nymph Harmonia – the union of writing and peace.’
Later, Rushdie contrasts the foundations of contemporary European and American political cultures: ‘the Western European idea of freedomn is freedom from religion, not to be declared ‘anathema’ by the church. In the United States liberty is freedom to have religion…. the main preoccupation of the First Amendment.’
Islam:
‘It is important to understand that Islam has never created a free society…’
‘In an open society, people constantly questions their first foundations on which they are based and disagrees on them. [Thus] it shifts and those disagreements shift. …. Societies that don’t allow you to question the fundamental principals on which they are based are not free.’
‘Literalists who insist [that religion is based on] the actual word of god… Once can’t be quesitoned other things atrophy. …Questions are considered to be blasphemy. A stultifying atmosphere results.’
And later, recommending the book of David Eggers What is the What: ‘as for the question of ethics, I don’t want to be told by some priest how to live… it is the Mystery’
Freedom
‘An open society requires the ability to quesiton. If you can’t ask difficult questions, quesitons people don’t want asked… you can’t grow.’
‘If you look at the cites of the Muslim world in the 50s and 60s… very different from today… Beirut, the Paris of the Middle East… Cairo. If have witnessed their backsliding into a bog of narrow mindedness during my lifetime… in part a self-inflicted wound.’
‘Who would you rather be, a heretic, apostate or a blasphemer?’
The Global: East and West
‘Amerigo Vespucci was one of the first to understand that this [American continents] was a new thing, it was not India. It was very very big and another big ocean was on the other side… [The 1400s are] a world in which one can see our world at the moment of its birth. [The natives of the New World had a very different sense of time, which didn't invovle progress].. The time included the collision of two different existential ideas of how one lived … either …in a sense of eternity or in a Western European sy in dynamic linear time.’
‘What united these worlds [the Mughal and Florentine Courts] was a belief in magic, even more than god. If you gell in love…you went and got a love potion to make the other person love you back. …[It was a time of the] use of sexual charms. …how to manuals.’
‘The division of East and West is a retro notion which is broken down inside me. Bombay was built in India as an English city on Indian soil. [There is no ancient] Bombay… Old bombay was a fishing village.’
Rushdie’s hilarious comments on American politics and the election of Obama can be found in the broadcast version of this interview.
Salman Rushdi was in Edmonton to launch the inaugural Festival of Ideas and as part of the University of Alberta Centenary. He spoke to Eleanor Wachtel at a full house in the Winspear Centre. Their conversation will be broadcast on CBC Radio’s ‘Writers and Company‘.
- Rob
{ 3 } Comments
I presume that the book “The Enchantress of Florence” written by Salman Rushdi represents a personal judgment of conceptual transformation of his ideas concerning Travelling, The Global, Freedom, Religion, Family/Home. This basic transformation is grounded on spatial search of both freedom and truth in the world, as well as in the most amiable writer’s places – Bombay and England. This interaction of new cultures is mainly related to a somewhat linear transformation which proved that there is a notable set of layers underlying the existing notion of globalization. The theory of globalization expressed by the author in his book deals with the ironical nature of world perception and is directed towards tackling the most important social, political and cultural issues of nowadays.
However, the ideas of intercultural communication are a new source of the writer’s reaction against Realistic perception of different cultures and an idealistic views on everyday life; that serves as a substitution for most wanted arguments concerning natural changes in the present society – social manifesto which bears a matter-of-fact nature of description in the book. Subsequently, reasoning of any of situational subjects draws readers’ attention and makes them reconsider the tackled idea by themselves. Such transformational approach of the author reminds of a Symbolist art: that is a static and hieratic art in modern times.
The book is evidently idealogically – oriented and reveals the nature of creative development. It therefore attempts to show the need of social transformations in society in India and in England in a certain degree. This social transformation approach in literature is regarded by me as a valuable means to acheive strengthening of social bonds between cultures and described countries. The mentioning of historic gradation of transformations within a society brings forward the ideas of the future and social human rights, “vast impersonal forces” which are impetuous in changing the world from within and from outside, in a definite community and in a certain period of time. This view is also represented by Daniel Gross (“Why the world’s economic leaders blame the catastrophe on the system instead of themselves”).
Success and failure to achieve success, be lucky in a social environment are viewed by me in a globalization perspective, and it addresses the writer’s research into reconsidering the true value of life occurrences and events, with most of social breakthroughs and shifts included.
Why were you surprised at Rushdie’s wit and knowledge of the world? I would expect him to be the wittiest and most intelligent among us.